Home / Code

Qodo

Qodo (formerly CodiumAI) reviews pull requests with multiple AI agents that learn your team's rules, check cross-repo impact and map your services.

Code · primary
Paid0 saves0 upvotes0 likes0 views
Visit website

Sign in to rate this tool.

Overview

Qodo is the company formerly known as CodiumAI, and its focus has narrowed to one problem: reviewing code before it ships. Now at version 3.0, Qodo describes itself as quality control for the "agentic software factory," meaning teams where AI agents write a growing share of the code and humans need a reliable check on it.

The core product is multi-agent code review on pull requests. It enforces your organisation's standards on every PR, and a rules system turns the conventions your senior engineers keep repeating in review comments into written, self-learning standards. Around that:

  • Wisdom Base pulls in knowledge from your codebase, PR history and business requirements.
  • Cross Repo Review flags changes that would break other repositories downstream.
  • Software Map (new) shows how repos, services and contracts connect, so you can see the blast radius of a change.
  • Agentic Toolbox gives coding agents such as Codex, Claude and Kiro a CLI-based quality partner.

It works through Git and IDE integrations, with review skills you can run before a PR is even opened.

Pricing

Qodo has no permanent free tier. You start with a free 14-day trial (no credit card; sign in with GitHub, Google or email and install it on your repos), then pick a plan. Qualifying open-source projects can apply for free access.

  • Pro Team, for up to 30 users: the page shows a starting price of $30, with credits at $0.012 each, pooled across the team. Credit packs are sized for roughly 18, 36 or 144 reviews a month, and you can switch packs at any time. Billing is monthly with no annual commitment, and you can set a monthly overage cap.
  • Enterprise, for 30+ users: custom pricing with SSO/SAML, audit logs, governance analytics, bring-your-own LLM keys, single-tenant SaaS or on-prem deployment, and a dedicated CSM.

Smaller PRs use fewer credits than large or complex ones, and the dashboard shows your balance and burn rate. Checked October 2026 on qodo.ai/pricing.

Who it's for

Engineering teams with steady PR volume, especially ones adopting coding agents and worried about consistency. Solo developers will find the lack of a free tier a barrier.

Pros: review that learns your team's own rules; cross-repo impact checks; on-prem option for regulated companies.
Cons: credit-based billing needs monitoring; no free plan after the trial; the most advanced learning features are Enterprise-only.

Alternatives

For writing code rather than reviewing it, compare Cursor, Cline and GitHub Copilot.

Details

Pricing
Paid
Release date
2025-12-09
Last checked
14h ago
Indexing
index, follow
Category
Code
Suggest an edit

Sign in to suggest an edit.

Alternatives

Sourcery SentinelWhat stands out most is predictability. The same input produces dependable output, which matters when you are producing work for clients or publishing on a schedule. Sourcery Sentinel brings a...FreemiumWarpWarp pairs a modern terminal with coding agents and cloud agent fleets, with usage included at API rates on its Build, Max and Business plans.FreemiumGitHub CopilotGitHub Copilot review (October 2026): AI coding assistant in your editor and on GitHub, verified Free, Pro, Pro+ and Max plans and AI Credits explained.Paid · from $10/moSponsoredCursorCursor review (October 2026): AI-first code editor with agents, verified Hobby, Pro, Pro+, Ultra and Teams pricing, privacy mode, pros and cons.FreemiumDatarails ComBefore you decide, skip the speculation and look at the source. datarails.com shows exactly what Datarails Com does today and how to get started with it. Teams running regular ai...PaidKadoaIf ai coding tasks take up too much of your day, Kadoa is built to give you time back. It handles the heavy lifting while leaving you in control. A...PaidCruderraIt is a practical choice for ai coding work, and the honest way to evaluate it is to give it a spin. Start at cruderra.com for the latest information. If...PaidEarlyaiIf ai agents tasks are part of your routine, Earlyai is worth testing against your own use cases. Their website, startearly.ai, has the full details. You will find a free...PaidMy Real Estate Listing AIYou will find a free plan, making it easy to test the tool against your own needs first. The practical way to judge it is to use it. You are...FreemiumRespond IoCollaboration hooks are there too - simple ways to pass work between teammates without emailing files back and forth or losing track of versions. It is a practical choice for...PaidWebo AIFreelancers use it to keep client work moving, while in-house teams rely on it for consistent output across projects. Either way, the routine parts of ai image generation work get...PaidApi Governance TestingApi Governance Testing brings a fresh take on ai coding tools, pairing powerful AI with an interface that does not get in the way. It is aimed at everyday users...Freemium

Pros and cons

Pros

  • review that learns your team's own rules
  • cross-repo impact checks
  • on-prem option for regulated companies

Cons

  • credit-based billing needs monitoring
  • no free plan after the trial
  • the most advanced learning features are Enterprise-only